| the honourable member |
763 |
| the minister for |
541 |
| honourable member for |
527 |
| of the house |
349 |
| members of the |
216 |
| the labor party |
199 |
| minister for social |
183 |
| for social security |
181 |
| leader of the |
180 |
| one of the |
167 |
| in accordance with |
166 |
| per cent of |
166 |
| to the honourable |
159 |
| of the opposition |
159 |
| the government ‘s |
158 |
| the tariff board |
153 |
| accordance with the |
150 |
| the prime minister |
143 |
| the honourable gentleman |
141 |
| i move that |
136 |
| the department of |
136 |
| i believe that |
130 |
| asked the minister |
130 |
| of the government |
125 |
| side of the |
124 |
| the leader of |
123 |
| of the australian |
122 |
| referred to the |
121 |
| that the government |
114 |
| of the public |
113 |
| would like to |
113 |
| standing committee on |
110 |
| the provisions of |
110 |
| i would like |
110 |
| provisions of the |
108 |
| public works committee |
107 |
| the public works |
107 |
| the government has |
100 |
| the committee has |
98 |
| have thought that |
98 |
| the minister ‘s |
96 |
| the australian democrats |
96 |
| in this house |
96 |
| committee on public |
95 |
| on public works |
95 |
| the parliamentary standing |
94 |
| would have thought |
94 |
| parliamentary standing committee |
94 |
| to the parliamentary |
93 |
| this side of |
93 |
| the proposed work |
92 |
| honourable member ‘s |
91 |
| that in accordance |
91 |
| works committee act |
91 |
| in relation to |
90 |
| to the minister |
90 |
| the following proposed |
90 |
| with the provisions |
90 |
| of the minister |
89 |
| it would be |
88 |
| on this side |
88 |
| of the proposed |
88 |
| following proposed work |
87 |
| the estimated cost |
86 |
| that the minister |
85 |
| the liberal party |
85 |
| i would have |
85 |
| answer to the |
84 |
| customs and excise |
83 |
| by the minister |
83 |
| in this country |
81 |
| move that in |
80 |
| i commend the |
79 |
| of the committee |
78 |
| cost of the |
78 |
| i present the |
77 |
| customs tariff proposals |
77 |
| australian labor party |
75 |
| i think that |
75 |
| member ‘s question |
75 |
| by the government |
75 |
| do not know |
73 |
| the australian labor |
73 |
| to say that |
73 |
| to carry out |
73 |
| estimated cost of |
72 |
| i ask the |
72 |
| the government is |
70 |
| to make a |
70 |
| in the senate |
70 |
| the customs tariff |
69 |
| i know that |
69 |
| of the honourable |
69 |
| trade and industry |
68 |
| which was referred |
68 |
| carry out the |
68 |
| upon notice on |
68 |
| was referred to |
68 |
| it is expedient |
68 |
| proposed work which |
68 |
| public works and |
67 |
| works and on |
67 |
| the answer to |
67 |
| which the committee |
67 |
| out the following |
67 |
| work which was |
67 |
| is expedient to |
67 |
| that the honourable |
66 |
| committee has duly |
66 |
| duly reported to |
66 |
| has duly reported |
66 |
| expedient to carry |
66 |
| second reading speech |
66 |
| the minister representing |
66 |
| i am sure |
65 |
| minister representing the |
65 |
| the fact that |
65 |
| that the bill |
65 |
| reported to parliament |
65 |
| by the honourable |
64 |
| citizens of australia |
64 |
| of the senate |
63 |
| construction of a |
63 |
| part of the |
62 |
| minister for trade |
62 |
| be able to |
61 |
| for trade and |
61 |
| cent of the |
61 |
| present the following |
61 |
| representing the minister |
61 |
| on behalf of |
61 |
| way in which |
61 |
| the house to |
61 |
| as far as |
60 |
| the united states |
60 |
| to the government |
60 |
| per cent general |
60 |
| proposed work is |
59 |
| committee act 1969 |
59 |
| of the bill |
59 |
| in parliament assembled |
59 |
| the house of |
59 |
| my colleague the |
58 |
| move that the |
58 |
| question resolved in |
58 |
| new south wales |
58 |
| the house in |
58 |
| member of the |
58 |
| ’s question is |
58 |
| the concurrence of |
58 |
| resolved in the |
58 |
| the question of |
58 |
| in the affirmative |
58 |
| read a second |
57 |
| a second time |
57 |
| on motion by |
57 |
| the minister has |
56 |
| i think it |
56 |
| we believe that |
56 |
| house in this |
55 |
| in respect of |
55 |
| the cost of |
55 |
| house of representatives |
54 |
| tariff proposals no |
54 |
| i hope that |
54 |
| is as follows |
54 |
| minister for health |
54 |
| motion by mr |
54 |
| debate on motion |
53 |
| recommendations of the |
53 |
| believe that the |
53 |
| of this parliament |
53 |
| detailed planning can |
52 |
| the recommendations of |
52 |
| my friend the |
52 |
| and members of |
52 |
| upon the concurrence |
52 |
| 20 per cent |
51 |
| concurrence of the |
51 |
| of this bill |
51 |
| in this resolution |
51 |
| as i understand |
51 |
| planning can proceed |
51 |
| question is as |
51 |
| resolution detailed planning |
50 |
| the senate in |
50 |
| the number of |
50 |
| this resolution detailed |
50 |
| made by the |
50 |
| that the opposition |
49 |
| behalf of the |
49 |
| average weekly earnings |
49 |
| mr deputy speaker |
49 |
| i wish to |
49 |
| per cent preferential |
49 |
| said that the |
48 |
| of the labor |
48 |
| at this stage |
48 |
| people who are |
47 |
| the government in |
47 |