Words used by BESSELL, Eric during the 1970s
Bigrams |
Number of uses |
the minister |
202 |
the government |
123 |
i think |
120 |
minister for |
99 |
per cent |
90 |
the people |
85 |
the industry |
75 |
the australian |
73 |
my question |
57 |
cost of |
56 |
the cost |
53 |
representing the |
51 |
of tasmania |
50 |
the dairy |
49 |
would be |
47 |
minister representing |
47 |
number of |
45 |
the situation |
44 |
in tasmania |
44 |
one of |
43 |
people who |
41 |
is directed |
38 |
directed to |
38 |
think that |
35 |
think it |
35 |
relates to |
34 |
king island |
33 |
able to |
32 |
increase in |
30 |
in australia |
30 |
i ask |
29 |
situation in |
27 |
for agriculture |
26 |
dairy industry |
26 |
the present |
25 |
people of |
25 |
the senate |
25 |
of course |
25 |
the costs |
25 |
industry in |
24 |
need for |
23 |
government has |
23 |
people in |
23 |
would have |
23 |
this bill |
23 |
it would |
23 |
the problems |
23 |
to make |
23 |
question is |
23 |
many of |
23 |
look at |
22 |
the report |
22 |
know that |
22 |
associated with |
22 |
government ‘s |
22 |
we see |
22 |
amount of |
22 |
a long |
22 |
national line |
21 |
fact that |
21 |
australian national |
21 |
of people |
21 |
view of |
20 |
fairly obvious |
20 |
local government |
20 |
sort of |
20 |
regard to |
20 |
line haul |
20 |
the current |
20 |
side of |
20 |
not think |
20 |
this matter |
19 |
is fairly |
19 |
the commonwealth |
19 |
a number |
19 |
the last |
19 |
of australia |
19 |
price of |
19 |
question which |
19 |
tasmania and |
18 |
by senator |
18 |
a week |
18 |
cent of |
18 |
part of |
18 |
a total |
18 |
would not |
18 |
available to |
18 |
may well |
18 |
this industry |
18 |
at least |
17 |
australian government |
17 |
said that |
17 |
we would |
17 |
the price |
17 |
not know |
17 |
last year |
17 |
labor and |
17 |
the island |
17 |
and immigration |
17 |
a tremendous |
17 |
for labor |
17 |
the total |
17 |
think the |
17 |
industry and |
17 |
long time |
17 |
federal government |
17 |
of transport |
17 |
in view |
17 |
the time |
17 |
the federal |
16 |
in fact |
16 |
the bill |
16 |
i would |
16 |
asked the |
16 |
obvious that |
16 |
the state |
16 |
a situation |
16 |
it may |
16 |
hope that |
16 |
a need |
16 |
a good |
16 |
making a |
16 |
with regard |
15 |
wish to |
15 |
could be |
15 |
be able |
15 |
question to |
15 |
senator everett |
15 |
to pay |
15 |
this situation |
15 |
the bridge |
15 |
going to |
15 |
cost to |
15 |
to assist |
15 |
the figures |
15 |
not necessarily |
15 |
to get |
15 |
no longer |
15 |
a lot |
14 |
this year |
14 |
been made |
14 |
upon notice |
14 |
the previous |
14 |
the company |
14 |
a question |
14 |
very much |
14 |
to tasmania |
14 |
the number |
14 |
industry is |
14 |
members of |
14 |
prime minister |
14 |
well be |
14 |
due to |
14 |
think we |
14 |
the tasmanian |
14 |
the opposition |
14 |
the amount |
13 |
i refer |
13 |
the committee |
13 |
refer to |
13 |
the eastern |
13 |
honourable senators |
13 |
i know |
13 |
these people |
13 |
grants commission |
13 |
the fact |
13 |
we know |
13 |
per lb |
13 |
involved in |
13 |
this government |
13 |
the service |
13 |
these figures |
13 |
we find |
13 |
rural industry |
13 |
the corporation |
13 |
that one |
13 |
problems associated |
13 |
type of |
13 |
a year |
13 |
want to |
13 |
but also |
13 |
lack of |
13 |
particularly in |
13 |
be made |
13 |
lot of |
13 |
the prime |
12 |
within the |
12 |
likely to |
12 |
to maintain |
12 |
the king |
12 |
rate of |
12 |
like to |
12 |
the amendment |
12 |
to take |
12 |
the north-west |
12 |
brought about |
12 |
i believe |
12 |
we look |
12 |
say that |
12 |
economic situation |
12 |