Words used by GILES, Geoffrey during the 1970s
Trigrams | Number of uses |
---|---|
the honourable member | 1652 |
honourable member for | 1268 |
the minister for | 348 |
in relation to | 302 |
of the house | 288 |
in south australia | 219 |
the fact that | 213 |
side of the | 185 |
the prime minister | 173 |
of the opposition | 173 |
that the government | 167 |
leader of the | 167 |
of south australia | 163 |
order the honourable | 160 |
i think that | 157 |
of the australian | 156 |
honourable member ‘s | 155 |
the people of | 150 |
do not know | 148 |
the labor party | 147 |
members of the | 143 |
the government ‘s | 141 |
of the honourable | 141 |
i think it | 137 |
per cent of | 137 |
the government has | 136 |
i hope that | 136 |
one of the | 134 |
the leader of | 130 |
i believe that | 128 |
i would like | 128 |
think it is | 126 |
by the honourable | 125 |
this side of | 125 |
i wish to | 123 |
’s time has | 122 |
time has expired | 121 |
that the honourable | 121 |
would like to | 121 |
on this side | 119 |
member ‘s time | 118 |
of the government | 114 |
to say that | 112 |
in this house | 111 |
do not think | 109 |
to try to | 100 |
new south wales | 98 |
relation to the | 97 |
in this country | 97 |
the wine industry | 97 |
look at the | 96 |
member for sturt | 95 |
in order to | 95 |
in my electorate | 92 |
the south australian | 91 |
people of australia | 86 |
member for riverina | 84 |
honourable members opposite | 84 |
i want to | 84 |
the government is | 82 |
in terms of | 82 |
a matter of | 81 |
to the minister | 81 |
to the honourable | 79 |
to the house | 78 |
point of view | 77 |
at that time | 77 |
in the future | 76 |
as the honourable | 74 |
a lot of | 74 |
i think the | 74 |
by the government | 74 |
australian labor party | 73 |
it would be | 71 |
at this stage | 71 |
mr deputy speaker | 71 |
that the minister | 70 |
being no objection | 70 |
for primary industry | 70 |
be able to | 68 |
the number of | 68 |
minister for primary | 68 |
one or two | 68 |
the australian labor | 67 |
in the past | 67 |
member for adelaide | 67 |
on behalf of | 67 |
as a result | 67 |
of the industry | 66 |
a result of | 65 |
i refer to | 65 |
part of the | 64 |
before the house | 64 |
the house to | 64 |
i should like | 63 |
cent of the | 63 |
to the government | 63 |
a great deal | 62 |
of the people | 61 |
the cost of | 61 |
the sort of | 61 |
is leave granted | 61 |
the house of | 61 |
as far as | 60 |
fact that the | 60 |
the department of | 59 |
relation to this | 59 |
of this bill | 58 |
the use of | 58 |
refer to the | 58 |
the brandy industry | 58 |
the river murray | 57 |
read as follows | 57 |
do not believe | 57 |
the case of | 57 |
the electorate of | 56 |
on this matter | 56 |
this sort of | 56 |
in the case | 56 |
the united states | 55 |
should like to | 55 |
prime minister mr | 55 |
honourable members on | 54 |
granted there being | 54 |
the point of | 54 |
on the one | 54 |
think that the | 54 |
per cent in | 54 |
leave is granted | 53 |
no objection leave | 53 |
hope that the | 53 |
premier of south | 53 |
the government to | 53 |
leave granted there | 53 |
say that the | 53 |
objection leave is | 53 |
the other hand | 52 |
in respect of | 52 |
the one hand | 52 |
the premier of | 52 |
to the people | 52 |
of this country | 52 |
the problem of | 52 |
the australian people | 52 |
back to the | 52 |
to the fact | 51 |
to refer to | 50 |
the end of | 50 |
in the last | 50 |
in regard to | 50 |
to the australian | 50 |
the house that | 50 |
the minister ‘s | 49 |
in this debate | 49 |
the rate of | 49 |
member for dawson | 49 |
not know whether | 48 |
the united kingdom | 48 |
the federal government | 48 |
the government of | 48 |
by the minister | 48 |
member of the | 48 |
the whitlam government | 48 |
the state of | 48 |
at this point | 47 |
to this matter | 47 |
not think that | 47 |
made by the | 47 |
i ask the | 47 |
believe that the | 46 |
of the community | 46 |
a little while | 45 |
of this house | 45 |
members on this | 45 |
point out that | 45 |
is granted the | 45 |
way in which | 45 |
that the house | 45 |
in this case | 45 |
said that the | 44 |
of the labor | 44 |
the matter of | 44 |
honourable members will | 44 |
the previous government | 44 |
the people who | 44 |
the interests of | 43 |
at the time | 43 |
to the states | 43 |
due to the | 43 |
state of south | 43 |
would not be | 43 |
but i think | 43 |
that this government | 42 |
question resolved in | 42 |
in spite of | 42 |
the labor government | 42 |
question to the | 42 |
of the minister | 42 |
if i might | 42 |
sections of the | 42 |