Words used by OLLEY, Frank during the 1970s

Trigrams Number of uses
the country party 39
leader of the 22
the leader of 21
of the country 19
of the opposition 16
the minister for 14
of the australian 12
i believe that 12
members of the 9
the previous government 9
honourable members opposite 8
the people of 8
the australian capital 7
policies of the 7
australian capital territory 7
the labor government 7
australian wheat growers 7
that the australian 6
people of australia 6
believe that the 6
my question is 6
in country areas 6
to the minister 6
the northern territory 6
the present government 6
the government ‘s 6
the liberal party 6
the australian government 5
for the future 5
is directed to 5
capital territory and 5
by the australian 5
question is directed 5
the australian labor 5
a member of 5
to the people 5
of the present 5
the cost of 5
australian labor party 5
the australian people 5
member of the 5
for many years 5
directed to the 5
in the australian 5
government ‘s policies 4
the fact that 4
house of representatives 4
people in the 4
i refer to 4
will the minister 4
party and the 4
industries assistance commission 4
of the past 4
assistance commission bill 4
country party that 4
territory and the 4
the australian wheat 4
the right honourable 4
and the northern 4
as a result 4
new south wales 4
of the people 4
done for rural 4
the labor party 4
the people to 4
honourable member for 4
for primary industry 4
of the previous 4
liberal-country party government 3
the future of 3
representing the minister 3
the honourable member 3
to alter the 3
change of government 3
be done for 3
put to the 3
the attitude of 3
the opposition is 3
the provision of 3
minister representing the 3
it would be 3
the benefits of 3
country party is 3
labor party and 3
the united states 3
in the government 3
are entitled to 3
nothing was done 3
over the years 3
refer to the 3
minister for primary 3
the industries assistance 3
of the government 3
people to have 3
by the government 3
australian country party 3
as a whole 3
the minister representing 3
home savings grant 3
government the country 3
does the minister 3
side of the 3
the former government 3
his budget speech 3
the change of 3
the basis of 3
in his budget 3
the australian country 3
of the liberal 3
attitude of the 3
the policies of 3
of the house 3
members opposite are 3
on the basis 3
should be done 3
the problem of 3
in the cities 3
the problems of 3
is the minister 3
the same time 3
one of the 3
in the past 3
can the minister 3
fact that the 3
a result of 3
minister for the 3
right honourable gentleman 3
the people who 3
reform and innovation 2
so many years 2
australia should have 2
a budget which 2
joseph ‘s home 2
the development of 2
every primary producer 2
and i feel 2
for the capital 2
for rural industries 2
electors of hume 2
labor government on 2
in terms of 2
involved in the 2
the amount of 2
is to allow 2
election the next 2
to the parliament 2
future of the 2
our association with 2
as saying that 2
the australian electorate 2
citizens and are 2
australian community i 2
to cater for 2
rate of inflation 2
deluded that the 2
to primary industry 2
do not deny 2
assistance to primary 2
the people in 2
of australia and 2
by the opposition 2
amendment to the 2
president of the 2
to make any 2
the constitution to 2
of rural industry 2
the prices justification 2
industry it is 2
country areas is 2
that the public 2
ideal example of 2
the government to 2
home at young 2
the policy of 2
would not today 2
but also the 2
country party a 2
won many friends 2
of finance for 2
should not forget 2
justification tribunal the 2
not want the 2
australian farmers federation 2
primary industry is 2
any radical change 2
do not want 2
alter the constitution 2
by the treasurer 2
has been reduced 2
in the benefits 2
the argument that 2
is to alter 2
opposed by the 2
power to do 2
have their say 2
relationship with china 2
to win elections 2
of looking after 2
to country areas 2
for rural people 2