Words used by LACEY, Robert during the 1970s

Trigrams Number of uses
war in vietnam 15
the war in 13
of the government 10
the minister representing 10
the honourable senator 9
minister representing the 8
the government in 8
the minister for 8
is directed to 7
leader of the 7
question is directed 7
directed to the 7
in relation to 7
my question is 7
the leader of 6
to the minister 6
side of the 6
government in the 6
in the senate 6
to the war 6
in vietnam i 5
will the minister 5
labour and national 4
participation in the 4
the commonwealth government 4
the prime minister 4
in the war 4
of the senate 4
minister for labour 4
the fact that 4
for labour and 4
and national service 4
the federal government 4
the government ‘s 3
relation to the 3
the lack of 3
honourable senators on 3
representing the minister 3
it would be 3
not at war 3
is the minister 3
i can recall 3
the senate whether 3
the liberal party 3
one of the 3
asked the minister 3
mr bill weekes 3
the senate i 3
on this side 3
of the chamber 3
on that occasion 3
this side of 3
do not think 3
if the honourable 2
that war i 2
in the day 2
all cases of 2
technically not at 2
that minister may 2
minister representing that 2
to speak about 2
by saying that 2
a civilian alternative 2
to respond to 2
house of representatives 2
occasion i was 2
than 12 months 2
constitution in forcing 2
more than 12 2
of the house 2
government ‘s participation 2
reply to a 2
minister rep resenting 2
to 2 former 2
repatriation upon notice 2
they will get 2
as though australia 2
member of the 2
the minister rep 2
acts on national 2
i think it 2
an opportunity to 2
been able to 2
australia is technically 2
to that state 2
i believe that 2
young men to 2
not think that 2
12 months ago 2
he would have 2
tried to enlist 2
i can remember 2
be physically unfit 2
the question was 2
in vietnam at 2
the house of 2
dame dorothy tangney 2
left the liberal 2
on the notice 2
speakers at that 2
in vietnam was 2
about the war 2
speak about this 2
2 former governors-general 2
up of meat 2
article in the 2
recent article in 2
the whole of 2
to military service 2
to serve in 2
was technically at 2
in forcing young 2
my son was 2
alternative to military 2
refrained from mentioning 2
forcing young men 2
inter alia that 2
been stayed pending 2
that occasion i 2
president of the 2
on monday evening 2
though australia was 2
notice has the 2
as a result 2
concerned with paragraph 2
australia was technically 2
question was a 2
from mentioning the 2
technically at war 2
that the commonwealth 2
vietnam i have 2
build up of 2
which reads the 2
the vietnam situation 2
were investigated and 2
a question by 2
day i asked 2
respond to it 2
that all cases 2
in reply to 2
to the leader 2
that australia is 2
cause to be 2
i think the 2
at the moment 2
the minister advise 2
forces as though 2
the federal constitution 2
members of the 2
to a question 2
our participation in 2
may wish to 2
next day i 2
asked the leader 2
minister may wish 2
minister advise the 2
turn now to 2
great difficulty in 2
resume my seat 2
a look at 2
at this stage 2
1 turn now 2
of a civilian 2
and that action 2
advise the senate 2
i understand that 2
minister for repatriation 2
melbourne ‘age headed 2
on national service 2
in the melbourne 2
stayed pending consideration 2
representing that minister 2
of the fact 2
was no war 2
default were investigated 2
were made out 2
upon notice has 2
the notice paper 2
of shipping facilities 2
representing the prime 2
of the australian 2
about this matter 2
it a fact 2
of the war 2
not been able 2
whole of the 2
federal constitution in 2
is technically not 2
that were made 2
been opposed to 2
investigated and that 2
ls it a 2
in vietnam and 2
wish to respond 2
resenting the minister 2
has the minister 2
have a look 2
’s participation in 2
national service breaches 2
in vietnam the 2